Date: 01-Mar-96 00:27:16 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Carl Bussjaeger <102065.1635@compuserve.com> Subject: Do you want a party??? {original post had no questions} "The whole time I was at Wright-Paterson...." So, which one of those labs has the crashed UFOs, huh? huh? jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 00:27:17 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Lynn Dimock <74471.3131@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} The island of Drafa. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 00:44:08 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: DONALD BYRNE <75454.1265@compuserve.com> Subject: Enjoying Babylon 5 {original post had no questions} Thanks, it's a lot of fun to do it. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 00:44:09 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> asks: > - Haven't rewatched the tape, but was there a mention of a ship > called Schwartzkopf, letting Hague escape from Io? - Who blasted > the escorts of the Alexander, if we saw and were told they > escaped? When we come back, the very next episode has a very funny scene re: Londo and Narn security. And yes, that was the Schwartzkopf. Thanks.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 12:30:20 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> asks: > Incidently, what were Londo's first two choices? Centauri are always suspicious, and if you knew you might be emperor after the other is dead, you might be encourage to...help that process along, however you might like someone. It's just good business. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 12:30:21 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> asks: > What was it's final condition, and which side is Stephen's father > on? Stephen's father is a by-the-book guy; he doesn't think his job is to set policy, only to implement policy. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 12:55:26 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Ruth Ballam <100412.3457@compuserve.com> Subject: SFX Magazine Awards Ruth Ballam <100412.3457@compuserve.com> asks: > Question has to be, what's he doing in television then ? "what's he doing in television then?" Nailing 95 theses to the door of science fiction television. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 15:02:45 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: All Subject: Violating Your Privacy All messages entered into the Compuserve system are copyrighted by CIS, and the user; they cannot be posted elsewhere without the permission of the sender, and the system. Mine are somewhat of an exception, since they can be posted anywhere, but even there I had to write specifically to AOL giving permission before they'd allow my messages from here to be reprinted. It is always required to do this; otherwise it's not only morally repugnant, it's illegal. A user named Theron Fuller has just taken a great number of your messages posted on the DS9 and B5 folders and reposted them to the Internet (rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5). Among those users whose messages have been taken without their knowledge or permission are Rae Augenstein, Anthony Davis, and Jose J. Ortiz Carlo. There are apparently more. To verify this all you need to do is go over to that forum and look for threads with "so you miss Joe Straczynski's dialogue" -- or words to that effect -- in the thread. From Theron's own statements, these were excerpted from a *mailing list* which some individuals maintain for the sole purpose of forwarding messages they think will do me harm. Or in general, to keep track of me, as stalkers do. (This statement by Theron is also in the same thread there.) One individual has indicated that this mailing list was maintained by the Hall Brothers. So apparently your compuserve messages (and AOL messages, and who knows how many others) have been circulated without your knowledge or permission, posted and reposted on other forums, and mailing lists. And now he has begun posting your messages publicly. This is a violation of both your copyright and that of Compuserve. It is morally and ethically repugnant. It is illegal. If you object, I suggest you contact Compuserve and register your displeasure with this, and also the postmaster at Theron's account, since he was the one who publicly violated your copyright, and took your messages without your permission. (The users cited, btw, are only the ones noted in the current batch of messages he reposted; the odds are good that virtually *everyone* here has been excerpted and remailed/reposted since this mailing list has been going on for some time.) I would suggest you demand to have access to the mailing list of all reposted messages from Compuserve (and that those on other services do the same). Theron Fuller's user id is fuller@ix.netcom.com and the postmaster can likely be found there. I would also suggest that the sysops here lodge a formal protest, and get CIS to do the same, in order to protect the rights not only of CIS, but of the users to post here and know that their words will not be excerpted, reposted, or otherwise used in or out of context without their knowledge or permission. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 17:51:15 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Steve Ramage <74731.235@compuserve.com> Subject: Christoper Fry Steve Ramage <74731.235@compuserve.com> asks: > Carter? I agree; Fry's work must be read or heard aloud to be most fully appreciated. It has a wonderful cadence, and the vocablary is really quite extraordinary. Some of his imagery is amazing. I don't know if Marcus is so much in that vein as it might be, but there are probably some influences here and there. Certainly when he winds up he can pick up some of that cadence.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 17:51:16 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: David Anderson <76560.205@compuserve.com> Subject: Enjoying Babylon 5 David Anderson <76560.205@compuserve.com> asks: > I was wondering if we will ever see the one remaining Narn > cruiser again? Yes, this season in fact. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 17:51:17 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John Hardin <74076.22@compuserve.com> Subject: B5's 'failings' John Hardin <74076.22@compuserve.com> asks: > Hey, Joe, why can't *your* sci-fi show finagle a special tribute > to itself on an awards show? Or arrange a sketch on late-night TV > with Jay Leno on its set, being stupid with one of its > characters? Or have two of its principles slum out of a camper in > the boondocks, appear between sections of a movie (say, "The Four > Seasons") on a Saturday afternoon and make insipid comments about > the movie, and have pleas to watch B5 interspersed, disguised as > network identification? And how come you can't manage to produce > even a single B5 episode with a tidy, formula plot and a preachy, > politically correct moral that's about as subtle as a freight > train? Creative, well-thought storylines; thought-provoking > exploration of important issues that resist the urge for easy > answers; intense drama and intelligent comedy; insight into > individuals and societies; dynamite special effects; complex, > three-dimensional yet believable characters, excellently > portrayed by top-notch actors: just how far do you think that > *these* will take you? I strongly suspect that one of us needs to lie down for a long, long time.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 17:51:19 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: The Jawa / Jawa #2 <76371.3057@compuserve.com> Subject: More Patricia Tallman The Jawa / Jawa #2 <76371.3057@compuserve.com> asks: > The Jawa Kidism Patrol 7:34 PM, Friday, March 01, 1996 "Did I > mention that my nose is on fire?" For what it's worth, I tend to agree. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 20:35:21 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> asks: > Wouldn't doing so vastly exxagerate their importance - and be > just what they want? How could anything I or others on this forum > write be harmful to you or the show? Put it another way: is it > worth it? Is there any indication they have harmfully falsified > the posts of this forum? No, I don't mind if my messages get reposted all over; I've long ago given permission for anything I write to get reposted anywhere. It's just that others have been having their stuff reposted, without their knowing, and I find it vastly inappropriate to do so without the courtesy of even letting them know. It's a real breach of trust. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 20:35:22 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} Thanks...it's either gutsy or *real* stupid on my part.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 20:35:25 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Michael Grabois <74737.2600@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Michael Grabois <74737.2600@compuserve.com> asks: > Right? Approximately, yeah.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 23:16:27 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Joel Hilke <102354.1702@compuserve.com> Subject: Joel Hilke <102354.1702@compuserve.com> asks: > And what's your problem with that? "B5 has gravity defying video cameras" Only if you consider a plane or any other reasonable technology of flight to be gravity defying. The video recorders are made of an extremely ultralight material, new alloys that in total weighs less than an ounce; it has a visible (and audible) air propulsion system, a high speed fan with a stabalizer/gyroscope that keeps it steady, and move it forward. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 23:28:43 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John L. Creigh <75270.423@compuserve.com> Subject: John L. Creigh <75270.423@compuserve.com> asks: > Was that your intent? It's more universal than that. Any time there's a big disease, we get Stupid. The same exact thing happened with the Black Plague, as was mentioned in the episode...instead of blaming gays, the leaders of the time blamed jews and lepers. The whole *point* is to drop politics and scapegoating whichEVER disease it happens to be next...and there is always a next...and focus on the problem: the disease. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 23:28:43 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Joe Salemi [ZD Net] <72631.23@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Joe Salemi [ZD Net] <72631.23@compuserve.com> asks: > Ta'Lon's line about "All answers are replies, but not all replies > are answers" -- is that from something else (a paraphrase > perhaps)? No, I don't think that's a quote from anywhere but the show, at least insofar as I know. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 23:28:44 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Joe Salemi [ZD Net] <72631.23@compuserve.com> Subject: Joe Salemi [ZD Net] <72631.23@compuserve.com> asks: > I was wondering about that; so, unlike the usual pattern where > each show is a few weeks after the last, these three are > continuous over a span of a couple of days? Not per se, no; you can have one picking up a frame later, but there are still time gaps in *story*. Between 1 and 2 there's only a few hours; but between 2 and 3 there's several days or so. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 23:32:43 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> asks: > Only: what permanent remedy is there? > Legal action? > And who has the time or the means to pursue that? > Physical violence? There is no permanent solution; but people should be aware of this, in case they do have a problem with it, so that they can at least know it's going on...at most perhaps encourage those doing this to cease by virtue of complaining about it to them or to their service providers. jms ------------------------------ Date: 01-Mar-96 23:32:44 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Joe Salemi [ZD Net] <72631.23@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} Agreed. When I have to go see the dentist, the #1 item on my fear hit parade...I'm fragging *hysterical*, in the sense that I'm constantly cracking jokes. It's the only way I can deal with it short of passing out. jms ------------------------------ Date: 02-Mar-96 18:56:32 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Karen E. Bahnsen <102735.3557@compuserve.com> Subject: <> {original post had no questions} If a word comes out of a character's mouth, it's usually mine. The bit about greatness was one of them; had a number of different subtexts going on behind it. jms ------------------------------ Date: 02-Mar-96 18:56:33 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Richard Cunningham <71213.3504@compuserve.com> Subject: San Diego ComiCon? Richard Cunningham <71213.3504@compuserve.com> asks: > Okay..since I got my little sign-up guide for SDCC the other day, > do you know if you'll be doing a presentation, and if so, which > day? Nothing's been firmed up, they haven't spoken to me directly yet, but invariably I do a presentation (usually they're one of the biggest events of the con), so I'd *imagine* nothing's changed this year, but at this point I don't have any real info. jms ------------------------------ Date: 02-Mar-96 19:09:59 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Automedia, Inc. <70530.2521@compuserve.com> Subject: Season 3 and Na'Toth Automedia, Inc. <70530.2521@compuserve.com> asks: > A question from my friend Vince: "Now that you've written all of > the season 3 scripts, can you tell us how things might have been > different had Na'Toth stayed in the storyline?" The story arc would've stayed the same; but the character would've had some good moments, and helped move it along. jms ------------------------------ Date: 02-Mar-96 19:10:00 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bernard F. Dowdy, J <76550.347@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy Bernard F. Dowdy, J <76550.347@compuserve.com> asks: > I probably know the answer to this already, but here goes: Have > you ever provided fans or viewers with any such documentation? "Have you ever provided fans or viewers with any such documentation?" I think I need clarification here...documentation of what? Also, if you did get a copy of the original email "digest" of messages from here, was there an address on the point of origin, i.e., who was sending them around initially? jms ------------------------------ Date: 02-Mar-96 19:10:03 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Chris Croughton <100014.3217@compuserve.com> Subject: Names... Chris Croughton <100014.3217@compuserve.com> asks: > So has that last name caused you problems, or has it been an > advantage in that people recognise it? The name's probably been a slight disadvantage from time to time, but not significantly so. jms ------------------------------ Date: 02-Mar-96 19:10:06 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Elyse M. Grasso <70302.3304@compuserve.com> Subject: Elyse M. Grasso <70302.3304@compuserve.com> asks: > Have you ever read "Goedel Escher Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid" > by Douglas Hofstadter? Have read some of Goedel's work, but not enough to be even remotely conversant about it. Yes, a lot of stuff is coming together in the story now. We've set up a lot over the last 2 years, now is the time to begin paying it all off, resolving threads left hanging, and moving the show to a different level. So a lot of stuff has to hit the fan here over the balance of this season. jms ------------------------------ Date: 02-Mar-96 19:10:09 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Rob Perlstein <103542.522@compuserve.com> Subject: Babylon 5 {original post had no questions} We're working on the video stuff now. Thanks for the support. jms ------------------------------ Date: 02-Mar-96 19:10:10 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Tom Knudsen <72347.1626@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Tom Knudsen <72347.1626@compuserve.com> asks: > The Alexander would be an Omega class ship, would it not? Correct, the Alexander would've come off the assembly line a bit after the Aggy. jms ------------------------------ Date: 02-Mar-96 19:10:12 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Michael Zitaglio <102545.641@compuserve.com> Subject: Shwartzkopff Michael Zitaglio <102545.641@compuserve.com> asks: > Does this mean that Franklin is backing Clarke? > Will we see which side Franklin chooses? Franklin is of the breed of officers who feels it isn't his place to set policy, only to execute it. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 00:02:20 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Neil Blevins <102226.3566@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy Neil Blevins <102226.3566@compuserve.com> asks: > Have you ever tried this tactic before? > Do you think he will gladly hand over his list of contacts at > C-serve? What you're forgetting in the conversation is the issue of copyright. As a poster here on this forum, everything that you write is the joint copyright of you and CIS. Copyright infringement is punishable by law. Now maybe one can't keep chasing down people who take others' messages and shut down their access to various systems, it's problematic...but for each time one engages in copyright infringement, the *minimum* penalty under the law is $100,000 per instance. If one chose to pursue it that far. It'd be no different than taking a whole section of, say, a Greg Bear novel, and posting it on the nets without his permission. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 00:02:22 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Stephen C. Smith <76150.1170@compuserve.com> Subject: PoNR-Hague {original post had no questions} No, Stephen, you've got that backward. We had booked Foxworth long in advance. Later, out of the blue, a rep for the actor said that by accident he'd been double-booked on B5 and DS9 for the same period...and even though we had prior claim, because the other was a two-parter, more money, they went for that. One can only wonder when the other offer *really* came in.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 00:02:25 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Randy Upshaw <75464.1275@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} "Even in the USSR the military would not support an attempt of martial law." You mean like when Yeltsin called up the military, dissolved the Senate, and had tanks open fire on the Senate building to keep from being ousted in a coup...you mean like that? jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 00:02:29 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Randy Upshaw <75464.1275@compuserve.com> Subject: Randy Upshaw <75464.1275@compuserve.com> asks: > I don't see that that has anything to do with the b5 story line? > By the way were are the shadows??? "I don't believe a conservative nightwatch would be tolerated either." Senator Joseph McCarthy. The House Un-American Activities Committee. You can look it up. Also, there was a PBS documentary this past week on the blacklist; I suggest that ANYone who thinks we would never fall for something like the Nightwatch should take a look at it. It makes the Nightwatch look pale by comparison. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 00:32:49 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Cherns Major <75026.3723@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 PR Cherns Major <75026.3723@compuserve.com> asks: > This discussion (about a spoiler for Point of No Return) brings a > question to my mind: where do TVGuide and other publications get > their little capsule descriptions, anyway? I don't presume that > TVGuide has a screening room where they watch all programs that > will be aired in a month or so, just to come up with little > five-line descriptions; wouldn't there be some sort of system in > which the station provides these descriptions along with their > schedules? And, assuming that stations themselves don't have > description-writing screening panels (or even advance access, in > many cases, I imagine), wouldn't these descriptions come from the > program source itself? Which brings up another question: are > episode titles usually provided for shows that have them, and why > aren't these listed? Or am I 'way off track in all this supposing? Synopses come from one of two places: 1) a two-page synopsis from the studio/network, or 2) scripts provided to TV Guide by same. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 00:32:52 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Cherns Major <75026.3723@compuserve.com> Subject: Deja Vu Cherns Major <75026.3723@compuserve.com> asks: > Just out of curiosity, what would be the general time, from story > inception to broadcast, of a typical 1-hr sf show? So is there a > rule-of-thumb length of time during which we can assume that plot > similarities could be attributable to coincidence rather than, > er, "homage" (to put a nicer face on it than it deserves)? Or is > script security in the industry so lax that the question is > irrelevant? Well, there are a number of factors going into this, including that as we develop threads over time, they become apparent outside even before the script appears (as noted by some who've anticipated some revelations here, in broad strokes). One other element is that B5 is only able to do what we do on budget because we prepare a LONG time in advance. We have scripts on the deck, ready to shoot, 4-6 weeks sometimes before we roll film. During that time, scripts circulate to agents and others as casting and other production elements start moving. In many TV shows, the script often doesn't land on the stage floor until a few days before filming...in some cases, pages are still landing *as* they're filming. Once an episode is filmed, a 7 day process, it takes 52 days of post production before it's ready to air. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 00:32:54 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bernard F. Dowdy, J <76550.347@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy {original post had no questions} Okay, I *think* I know what that refers to; I wrote a long message on one of the services about the ratings system, but it's nothing I saved, I just explained it that one time as best I could. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 00:32:57 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Joel Hilke <102354.1702@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy {original post had no questions} Short version: anyone with even minor celebrity -- and there can be no more minor a celebrity than a producer -- attracts a certain number of what can only be described as stalkers. Stalkers range from vaguely annoying to disturbing (and disturbed) individuals. I have acquired about six or so who are dedicated to one singular goal: trying to disrupt my life, my career and my show through a constant, chronic pattern of abuse, insults, outright fabrications, disinformation campaigns, and innuendo. Six doesn't seem like a lot, and in the grander scheme, they're irrelevant; on the less grand level, because they are singularly dedicated to this cause, utterly tireless, they can, and have, paralyzed whole discussion areas, poisoned topics and made places on the net unlivable for me and many others. Several of them, if they were doing via other means -- mail, phone, in person -- what they are doing on the nets, could easily be arrested and prosecuted under any of a number of anti-stalking laws, for creating malicious mischief, character assassination, and other charges. But the nature of the net makes it easier for these individuals -- who are basically cowards -- to do what they do with a relative (though shrinking) degree of impunity. Their behavior is pathological at best, and it was the exposure on a daily basis to their virulent pathology, the necessity to respond each and every day to the next new charge or rumor or lie -- which, if unanswered, becomes assumed truth on the nets -- that in time drove me from rastb5. As with most Internet newsgroups, it does not have the same safeguards against chronic abusive personalities that are present in CIS, AOL, GEnie and other systems and BBSs across the country. A number of people who've gotten tired of the chronic abuse of the system, and each other, recently resolved to try and create a new moderated group whose purpose would be to ONLY restrict these chronic, abusive messages from the petty dysfunctional, while allowing a) a full range of open criticism and language, and b) not in any way affecting or censoring the original rastb5 area. Any group of people can agree to come together and form a group of their own, with their own rules, which others may or may not choose to enter. When and if that group gets approved, many of the users who left rastb5 will sign on with this new group, myself included. (I understand there's a discussion about this issue currently going on over there, using the words censorship and nightwatch. Which are loaded terms designed to elicit an emotional response and muddy the waters. Censorship is enacted against an individual against his or her will; anyone who joins the moderated newsgroup, should it be approved, does so knowing the charter of the group, thus expressing a willingness to go along with that, just as anyone signing on with CIS understands the general guidelines here. If someone doesn't want to work under those guidelines, they need not sign on, and hang out in the unmoderated area. How this relatively simple logic gets muddied is beyond me.) In any event, to your question...if any of the less than rock-solid individuals noted three paragraphs above are asking for your cooperation, that decision is between you and your conscience. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 00:33:02 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Rae Augenstein <72752.1653@compuserve.com> Subject: Rae Augenstein <72752.1653@compuserve.com> asks: > You've thought of everything, haven't you? But of course.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 00:33:05 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Grady W. Smithey I <103321.2766@compuserve.com> Subject: Just wanted to say... {original post had no questions} Thanks...yes, Marcus does seem to have a way with women of taste and sensibility.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 00:33:07 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Joe Salemi [ZD Net] <72631.23@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy {original post had no questions} Absolutely. You're quite right. The other digest of my messages is a fine and fair thing, because I've said that my messages can be reposted anywhere, anytime. It's others who have not given their permission, and the messages involved, that they may need to be made aware of. (Darn, ended on a dangling preposition....) jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 00:33:10 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Joe Salemi [ZD Net] <72631.23@compuserve.com> Subject: Season 3 and Na'Toth Joe Salemi [ZD Net] <72631.23@compuserve.com> asks: > Am I correct in guessing that some of what would have been > Na'Toth's story moved over to Ta'Lon? Or did you plan on bringing > him back all along? I liked Ta'Lon, and definitely wanted to bring him back. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 00:33:11 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Burhaan Ahmad <75754.3065@compuserve.com> Subject: Prison Authors Burhaan Ahmad <75754.3065@compuserve.com> asks: > I suppose there is something behind this? It's just those darn Narns...politeness isn't easy for some of them. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 00:33:13 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Ray Pelzer <70475.1263@compuserve.com> Subject: Do you want a party??? Ray Pelzer <70475.1263@compuserve.com> asks: > Remember the stuff about the actual latitude and longitude of > "Area 51" being burned into the Newton 2.0 operating system, and > a CIA cryptographer found it, and they pressured Apple to remove > it from the time zones utility? How odd that they would be so concerned about a base that, they say, doesn't even exist.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 01:04:30 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Peter David <72550.2517@compuserve.com> Subject: Bill Mumy on CNBC {original post had no questions} BTW, Peter, I happened to catch the episode tonight (though I missed the opening and about 2-3 minutes at the top). Nicely done. I still think I preferred the commander from the test episode (now it's YOUR turn to hear that), but a lot has been improved, particularly the sets, which are very elaborate and visually interesting. Some fun writing, good (if somewhat over the top) directing, and the effects were quite good. This one may actually have some shelf life.... Congratulations. You are now officially a Mogul. Your certificate of membership should arrive in a few days. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 01:04:31 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> asks: > Is this sudden request related to the events of message abuse? If Brent Barrett -- not one of the Demento Half-Dozen -- is asking permission to repost your messages, then he's doing this properly. So if you don't mind your posts being reposted, by all means, give permission. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 01:04:32 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Karen E. Bahnsen <102735.3557@compuserve.com> Subject: <> {original post had no questions} Good heavens, Karen, there was nothing in your message to be offended *at*. I took the inquiry at face value, and answered it thus. Glad you enjoyed "Point." It sets everything up, so we can knock it all down in "Severed Dreams." Now everyhing I need is right where I need it to be.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 22:26:49 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bing F. Quock <76216.520@compuserve.com> Subject: Shwartzkopff Not that I know of.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:06:44 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Automedia, Inc. <70530.2521@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy Thank you for your forthrightness, and your honesty, and your dilligence in dealing with the situation. I think your approach is a good model for anyone in this situation. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:06:45 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Cynthia Tenen <75015.364@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy Well said, Cynthia. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:06:48 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Neil Blevins <102226.3566@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy Actually, casual copyright infringement has been dealt with more and more lately; one of the reason you see precise instructions in Kinko's Copier locations, and the reason they won't copy a full manuscript unless you can prove you own it, is because they got hit bigtime over the issue. It is, as you say, an area which has been dealt with only casually, but which I suspect is going to get more attention, particularly as the nets come more fully under the scrutiny of Suits. (I think I just made an inadvertent pun...) jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:06:50 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bernard F. Dowdy, J <76550.347@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy Not per se, but it was interesting nonetheless. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:06:52 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Joel Hilke <102354.1702@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy They do it because they ain't wired up right, Joel.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:06:56 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Neil Blevins <102226.3566@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy Every once in a while, I get something along these lines, though so far usually it's enough just to tell them to please back off a little. Their desire is usually well-meaning, just...overly enthusiastic. For a while, I was getting 7-8 messages a day from a few different people, in email, asking extremely detailed background questions, literally dozens at a time, every day. Eventually, I had to ask some of them to just back away and stop it. So far they have, some with greater grace than others. A related problem I have sometimes is that people will send me email with 5, 8, or 20 questions (literally), each question requiring an elaborate explanation to be clear. I don't think they understand the sheer volume of email I get on a daily basis. If a person sends me one or two questions I can answer fairly briefly, they'll usually get an answer. If it's something like this, I go into overload, and either say "sorry" or just don't reply. If I were to engage in that kind of detailed email correspondence, I'd a) never have time for the show, and b) 2/3rds of the rest of my email would never get answered. It's hard to fault them, because it's clear that their messages spring from real interest in the show. I just think they don't really understand how *much* email I get on a daily basis. (So in general, if it's a general question of any sort, from which others might benefit from the answer, *always* post it publicly instead of emailing it. This also saves me from having to answer the same question in email 50 times.) Then there was the one person I told to avoid sending me email with 15 questions...who solved the problem by sending me 15 emails with 1 question each..... jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:06:58 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Gerald Himmelein <100417.3703@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy For starters, read the message I just left here regarding my own email. To the question at hand...ask the reposter to please not repost your messages. From what I saw from Brent, he's a very reasonable fellow, and will oblige. Anyone else, tell them the same thing, if that's your decision. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:01 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Burhaan Ahmad <75754.3065@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy No, Brent seems okay. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:03 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Colin Knowles <72152.201@compuserve.com> Subject: PoNR-Hague Nope. There are better ways of handling this. You'll see. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:04 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Anne L. Warner <71513.1177@compuserve.com> Subject: I dunno....dunno if I want a funny dentist.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:07 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Chris Croughton <100014.3217@compuserve.com> Subject: Fan Club I imagine we'll have some info on how to deal with this soon; we're still sussing out all the details. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:09 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Peter David <72550.2517@compuserve.com> Subject: Bill Mumy on CNBC It *WAS* the same actor?! (thud) I'm astonished.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:13 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Shawn J Ashe <72460.1762@compuserve.com> Subject: We hope to have some more info on the fan club out soon. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:17 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Kevin L. Reed <75327.1046@compuserve.com> Subject: Earthforce Ship Names It was subconscious, but appropos. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:18 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Timothy C Schell <71174.2414@compuserve.com> Subject: No, the Epsilon machine wasn't built by the same folks; and Kosh was the prime mover in G'Kar's revelation. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:19 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Z. Michael Milutinovic <71532.2231@compuserve.com> Subject: To JMS....WOW!!!!! Thanks...we try to make it a good ride.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:23 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Michael Zitaglio <102545.641@compuserve.com> Subject: General Hague / EA Fleet No, most of the cruisers shot down were of the Hyperion class, slower and not as well equipped as the Omega class destroyers, a la the Aggy or the Alexander. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:25 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: FitzGeralds <103571.3245@compuserve.com> Subject: "Point of No Return" Yes, this season they're all my scripts, though that'll change next season. How does one do it? Practice. Listening. And you have to be willing to make a fool of yourself 10 times on the theory that on the 11th time, you'll do something terrific. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:25 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Don Crossman <75147.175@compuserve.com> Subject: PoNR: Zocalo Optics I have no explanation...will go check. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:28 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Al Lipscomb <75204.2225@compuserve.com> Subject: Bingo.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:30 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: William H. DiPaola <76521.1751@compuserve.com> Subject: New episodes I suspect it's an automated VO on the station computer; write them and let them know, and they'll likely change it. (And we get new eps the week of April 3rd.) jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:07:31 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Rick Sharon <76416.2213@compuserve.com> Subject: Thanks, and the powderkeg smoldering is a good analogy. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:24:54 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Ruth Ballam <100412.3457@compuserve.com> Subject: SFX Magazine Awards "JMS...a great mind and nice people..." Stop that. I have a reputation to protect, you know. jms ------------------------------ Date: 03-Mar-96 23:24:55 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John Hardin <74076.22@compuserve.com> Subject: Your copyright Just so we're clear...the problem is primarily with the mailer set up by the Hall Brothers, who were picking, choosing and editing threads for the express purpose of providing "ammo" to use by others in the Let's Get B5 and JMS arena. It's that use that had to be addressed, and it's spilled over into the other mailers. The flip side is that this *is* a legitimate issue, and had to be dealt with one way or another. I would also rather it hadn't come out in this way, but when the stuff is out there, it has the potential for misuse; it was inevitable that it would *be* misused...and now it has. Once again, the Usual Few misuse the system and cause more grief and emotion in a situation that could've been dealt with differently. jms ------------------------------ Date: 04-Mar-96 11:26:34 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <> Y'know, I think this was one of those subconscious things the brain does sometimes...I hadn't put it together when I put him on that ship. It's a sad thing when you can't even trust your own brain anymore. jms ------------------------------ Date: 04-Mar-96 11:26:35 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Yeah, I also heard that Paramount sent the US Navy a letter claiming that they owned the copyright to the term USS Enterprise, and that the Navy should cease and desist from using that name in future. The Navy told 'em to stick it where the sun don't shine. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 00:21:27 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: When will they be back? You'll see Morden and Zathras before the season is out. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 00:21:28 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: FitzGeralds <103571.3245@compuserve.com> Subject: "Point of No Return" No, I'm not going anywhere as far as B5 is concerned; we'll have some freelance scripts coming in in years 4 and 5, but that's just the same as in years 1 and 2. They'll almost certainly be based on assigned premises, and in all cases, I rewrite to make sure it all hangs together. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 00:21:31 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John Hardin <74076.22@compuserve.com> Subject: Comic books in U.S.? Let me try and address a problem I'm having with this question and the one preceding, both of which are from folks not on CIS. I've just gotten a number of emails from people saying they have a problem here, in the sense that they pay CIS for access to this forum, and the ability to ask questions publicly. To post a number of questions from people not subscribers on CIS, giving them that ability, bothers some of the users here who have to pay a subscription for that. Personally, for me, a question is a question regardless of source, and thus far, I've answered all questions forwarded from other services here. It's an awkward situation, because if this were a free service, as rastb5moderated would be, it doesn't *matter* where the questions come from, it's all equally free. But I'm sort of "living" in CIS's house while I'm here, and on a pragmatic level I have to be considerate of the wishes of the people in whose house I'm hanging out. Especially the wishes of the other users here. One user put it quite bluntly: "If they want to ask you questions on CIS, why don't they sign up and pay the money same as I do? This isn't fair." So I've been debating what to do about this. My only solution, poor as it is, is that questions here have to originate here. Once the moderated group is open, which is free to all, anyone from anywhere can ask as many questions as they choose, and this won't be an issue. For now, this seems the only fair solution. In short, I'd love to answer the forwarded questions, but I feel I have to be responsive to the wishes of the users here. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 00:21:34 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John Hardin <74076.22@compuserve.com> Subject: Cruisers? (PoNR) Ditto. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 00:21:36 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John Hardin <74076.22@compuserve.com> Subject: Labor Relations Ditto. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 00:21:37 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Demento Half-Dozen Not a problem, Kevin. You've usually been quite fair. (I agree about Penn and Teller...love 'em. They're just nuts.) I can see no reason not to oblige Brent and John Hardin with their requests for reposting from my side of it; these are, of course, issues of privacy, the latitude and longditude of which are circumscribed by the quiet turning of your own considered conscience. If you don't mind, then say yes; if you do mind, then say no. As for the masks, yes, I believe they're the licensed ones from Ruby. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 00:21:41 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Ray Pelzer <70475.1263@compuserve.com> Subject: It ain't an issue of copyright, but of *trademark*, which can be put on at any time. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 00:21:43 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <> Any time you do something that hasn't been done before, you will have people jumping on your head out of the near-religious conviction that they must do so for the good of the commonweal. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 00:44:52 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: B5 in SciFi Entertainmnt There are a number of actors who feel that if they're in a story, then they should be at the *center* of the story. Andrea seemed to feel that if she was in an episode, the episode should be about her character, and was consistently lobbying for this, despite the fact that it would cut into the arc, and time for the other characters on-screen. Babylon 5 is an ensemble show; time on screen is determined by the story, not by whim or personal insistence. Yes, we used her 8 or 9 times in a given season; but by contract, we paid her for a full 13 episodes, whether she appeared in them or not. We were never under any obligation to give her *any* guarantee; we did so to make her feel comfortable taking on the job. For the first year he was on the show Jeff Conaway didn't have a guarantee of episodes; he was used as he was needed, and that grew with time. Andrea wanted time away from the show to do other projects; we accommodated where we could, as we do with all our cast members, but if a request comes in at the last moment, or conflicts with our schedule, we can't comply. We feel that if we're paying someone a great sum of money to be available to us, for episodes they may not even appear in, this is not unreasonable. Finally, it was never Warner Bros. who hired her or pushed her on me. WB didn't care one way or another. I was the one who hired her, with Doug Netter. If I hadn't felt she was right for the role, I wouldn't have hired her. But I was also under no constraint to make the show into the Andrea Thompson Show. Andreas and Peter have often appeared as many times in a season as Andrea, and didn't even *have* a guarantee for the first two seasons. (Now they do.) We did what we could to accommodate her without destroying the story arc. I regret that she has taken out her frustrations in this way. Either one is a team player, part of an ensemble, or one is not. We are very proud of the fact that the cast members as they stand now are all ensemble, team players. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 00:44:53 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Not bad. Y'know, if I wuz you, I'd send this along to the rastb5-info group for archiving. Helps to answer the yahoos saying I've left the arc behind and gone off to Latveria to work for Dr. Doom or whatever nonsense is being proffered this week.... It still tracks. Individual threads come and go, but the story still tracks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 22:56:13 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: I want a poster {original post unavailable} We may do some limited posters for the fan club, yes; that's all that's on the boards just now. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 22:56:14 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John Hardin <74076.22@compuserve.com> Subject: Comic books in U.S.? John Hardin <74076.22@compuserve.com> asks: > However, given this policy, how do you respond to questions > emailed to your CIS address? It's an awful bind there as well. Up until now, I've been responding to most of my email. I guess I consider email different than a public posting, because anyone can direct email anyone without having to use an intermediary to post in a forum. And it's a private communication. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 22:56:17 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: <<> (blocked) asks: > The editing was reminiscent (sp? I get my drive from Dell Computers. The software comes from the improper allignment of my grey cells. And thanks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 22:56:20 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Finished Writing! {original post had no questions} From your lips to Hugo's ears.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 22:56:21 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: JMS Interview {original post unavailable} I think we're all getting old and cranky. Goodness knows I am.... Unfortunately, I was also young and cranky. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 22:56:24 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Comic books in U.S.? {original post unavailable} I absolutely agree on just about every count. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 22:56:26 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: B5 Doors / AI {original post unavailable} They will usually open automaticaly (from the inside); from the outside, you need to use an identicard. If you ask to enter, the person inside has to give the verbal cue. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 22:56:27 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Sarah E. Heacock <102412.1400@compuserve.com> Subject: Comic books in U.S.? {original post had no questions} Yeah...it's a very difficult issue, and one I'm still working through to find The Right Thing To Do. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 22:56:30 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> Subject: Fan Club Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> asks: > Will the fan club have an option for the non-netted? Yes, the club has to serve netters and non-netters just as well, or it's organizationally deficient. jms ------------------------------ Date: 05-Mar-96 22:56:33 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Yes, Lyta was to develop a relationship with the Vorlons from the start. Some of Garibaldi's past has caught up with him; there is more to come. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 00:07:42 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Evidence of an arc {original post unavailable} Let me straighten out two issues. On the Sinclair issue, I have never, at any time, said that the change was for ratings. When we decided to make that change, WB indicated that they'd like the next person in that chair to be more well-known. We had no problem with that, since we were considering Bruce at that time, as he was someone with whom both Doug Netter and John Copeland had worked before, and were nuts about. Re: Pat Tallman and Lyta...after the pilot, we made an offer to Pat for the series. This is a matter of public record. Pat can verify this. (Which right there puts the lie to the statement that WB didn't want her in the series; we *offered* her the series. We couldn't have made that offer if WB didn't want her there. Pure and simple.) What happened thereafter was a comedy of errors, with WB playing tough-guy with *all* the actors agents, and on the other side Pat getting some bad advice from a manager just brought on (and subsequently let go)...so that the deadline passed for an acceptance, and we had to move on. Pat has said this at cons and online many times over the last several years, long before we ever contacted her again about doing the show, so there's no need to take my word for this. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 01:44:02 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Kosh in US History {original post unavailable} I think your friend needs two weeks off in the Martian Pleasure Dome. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 18:32:44 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Enjoying Babylon 5 {original post unavailable} Thanks. I suggest you download Tapcis and use it; it makes sorting through the threads a lot easier. Welcome to the club. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 18:32:50 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: PoNR-Hague Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> asks: > Trying to give the guy the benifit of the doubt (he's had a > pretty damn rough last few months after all), but would it not > have been professional to at least give you guys a couple of > scenes to tie up characters threads? It wasn't workable, due to his schedule. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 18:32:52 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: Violating Your Privacy Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> asks: > Do you think that this is some innocent person that reposted a > bunch of our material which was then grabbed by the Fullers, or > is this some twisted scheme? You must understand that because I'm not on rastb5, my info comes secondhand. My understanding, from TF's own statements, is that this last round came about because of a mailer generated by people who like trying to "mind-phuque" me, of which he is one, and is thus on the list. (The term is his, cleaned up for cis.) There are, on the other hand, other lists compiled by people who're fans of the show, for general information purposes. They should not be considered in the same way, and as far as I can tell, they are going to great lengths to do this the right way. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 18:32:55 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: {original post had no questions} I disagree. When even Truman was loathe to take on HUAC and McCarthy, you've got a real problem. You make the impact sound minimal; but people committed suicide when their careers were ruined by HUAC and Tailgunner Joe. I personally know writers who were at the top of their form and their careers who never worked again because they were blacklisted or greylisted. It was also the climate created by HUAC that threatened much more widely than the actions of the committee itself. Take Red Channels, a sleazy little rag published by the owner of a *SUPERMARKET CHAIN* in which he listed those he considered -- based on whim or divine revelation -- reds or sympathetic to reds. Even a publication like that had tremendous destructive power. I know one of the writers listed in Red Channels; the networks grey-listed him instantly. It was *years* before he could work again. The whole red-baiting hysteria of the 50s came as close to destroying the American dream as any threatened invasion. If it had been led by someone a little less self-destructive than McCarthy, I hate to think what would've happened. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 18:32:57 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} I first heard about it at a con, from a member of the crew of the USS Enterprise. Also, when it happened, it was reported here and there in a few places. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 18:33:07 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Brian A. Thomas <75231.1122@compuserve.com> Subject: <> Brian A. Thomas <75231.1122@compuserve.com> asks: > You were not kidding when you said you were pulling the triggers > on the guns you set up were you? [Another moment of stunned > silance] What?! A repeat next?! > When in May do we get new episodes? You get new eps in April, the first week, rather than May. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 18:46:01 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: B5 Doors / AI {original post unavailable} You can program in a variety of commands, from OPEN to COME or YES, though the vaguer the statement, the more probability of a mistake. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 18:46:03 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Evidence of an arc {original post unavailable} "Basically, it was a decision by the WB suits that was mutually agreed to by all." Not correct. It was first broached by me, to Michael, for story reasons; we discussed it, mutually and amicably agreed that this would work out for both of us, and then confirmed this with WB, to whom we had indicated we might do this, pending the conversation with Michael. There's a long post here that was written by me and archived at the time; it's in one of the two B5 libraries. It goes into great detail on the whole thing. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 18:46:04 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} I appreciate that, thanks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 18:46:09 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Fan Club {original post unavailable} We have a PO box now, and we'll do ads in magazines and the like, plus maintaining a convention presence. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 18:46:10 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: B5 Doors / AI {original post unavailable} Yes, there's a sensor device, just as in your local drug store's automatic doors when you approach. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 22:42:51 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Evidence of an arc {original post unavailable} We learn by doing. jms ------------------------------ Date: 06-Mar-96 22:42:51 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: A complaint {original post unavailable} Okay, Greg, you asked for it, you got it...and it'll be in one of the very first batch of new episodes coming up. I'll narrow it down to the first four up, to avoid spoilers. But it's there. In spades. jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-Mar-96 16:06:20 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: William H. DiPaola <76521.1751@compuserve.com> Subject: The Future of B5 William H. DiPaola <76521.1751@compuserve.com> asks: > (I wonder if you see where I'm going with this.) Now, being that > B5 is set to be a 5 year arc, the completion of which will take > place in year 5, how might we expect to see things taking place > so far off into the future where the show's setting is concerned? > Do you plan near the end of the arc to jump the current time line > ahead twenty or thirty years so that we will get to see what > happens, or will we be left dangling somehow by events that will > not unfold? Well, the odds of a spinoff are few and far between to start with, so it's probably a moot point. To the other question.... See, this is a puzzlement to me. If I answer your question about when and how we'll see Londo's future, that ruins the show. This is the puzzling part...I often get notes saying, "When are we going to see this happen?" Well, if I were to say, "Okay, you're going to see G'Kar lose his eye in episode 7 of year 4," then it *completely eliminates* any surprise, any tension, any shock value to it. I might as well just not make the episode at that point. So I have an answer to your question. And we will deal with this point. But to simply blow it out there would be to destroy the impact of anything we might have in mind. It's funny...at conventions, actors get asked "how do you create this character," when the characters were created by me, and I get asked to reveal coming plot points that I *can't* reveal without kicking the props out from under the show. I can talk in general terms, but anything detailed has to go by the boards. jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-Mar-96 16:06:33 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> asks: > The *speed* of McCarthy's collapse with the simple words "Have > you no decency Sir? At long last?" Yes, but equally dangerous, Phil, is blindness or self-delusion about real failings and real problems. Each population that marched off to annhilation under a dictatorship did so convinced that their values and their morals and their national fabric was supremely strong. Pride has a tendency to goeth before a fall. For additional reading check out "The Man Who Corrupted Hadleyburg." Check out European history. We're not a different species over here on this side of the atlantic; we're just as capable of being foxed as the next guy in another country. And your notion that the government wasn't responsible for what happened to people during the HUAC period doesn't jibe with the truth. It was the FBI which contacted networks and asked them for lists of anyone considered communist; the FBI who suggested there might be problems unless certain people were removed. It wasn't just people who'd attended Young Communist meetings who were targeted...it was anyone who *knew* anyone who'd been at these things, or had in fact NEVER been to anything like this. People were called before HUAC and asked to *name names*, and if you didn't, then you were hiding something, being uncooperative, facing contempt charges, so you named the names that had been named before, or made up new ones, gave up your buddies or your co workers, whatever was necessary to keep from being jailed or fired. The problem was worse than just "inaccuracy." It was rooted in meanness and cynicism. I know someone who was asked during the second World War to make short films for the military and the newsreels, and to do radio shows, celebrating the US and the Soviet Union working together to defeat the Nazis. All well and good, right? Well, this same person, after the war, was grey-listed for having produced Communist propaganda MADE AT THE REQUEST OF OUR OWN GOVERNMENT at the time. Meanness. Cynicism. To be named before HUAC was to instantly get a file at the FBI in your name. As soon as that happened, you could reliably depend on having your phone tapped, your business associates would be questioned, your mail would be intercepted...no, the government didn't say publicly, "don't hire this person," but when all this starts to happen, jobs and reputations disappear. People committed suicide over the destruction of their careers, their *lives* being torn apart. Did McCarthy pull the trigger? No, but the people he targeted are just as dead as if he did. There's the common assumption that one measures the decline of a democracy in body counts and increasingly inconvenient laws and regulations. But this is symptom, not cause. Laws follow norms, and norms follow values in the political food chain. And the values of HUAC were the values of terror, and spying on your neighbor, and looking for the enemy beneath bedsheets. A democracy, ANY democracy, is based first and foremost on the notion of trust, however flawed, that the person beside you, however different his specific beliefs may be from your own, nonetheless hews to the same notions of liberty, and that when push comes to shove, you will be wiling to lay down your life to protect that person's rights. Take that away in a paroxysm of paranoia, distrust, conspiracies, hearings and vague accusations, and everything else falls apart. The center does not hold. To question ourselves is not to weaken our democracy, but to strengthen it, because we know precisely what we believe and why we believe it; we're not victims if we learn from our mistakes and thus fail to repeat them. If we *deny* our mistakes, or try to bury them, or rationalize them, then we create the potential for trouble. We are at our most vulnerable when we are the most self-congratulatory and assured. Because then we get blindsided. "Fact is, the Red Scare tended to get two specific (and fairly small) groups of people, Hollywood actors, writers and executives, and people affiliated with Democratic institutions." Yes, and the Nazis tended to get two specific (and fairly small) groups of people, jews and communists. So I guess that's okay too. Any attempt at repression *always* starts by first targeting artists, writers, and intellectuals, the ones in a position to verbalize and explain why what's happening is *wrong*. You want to eliminate, neutralize or destroy their credibility. This is standard operating procedure. That's where it starts, but not always where it ends. To assume that because we've always caught it before means we always *will* is, again, to set yourself up for a fall. The manipulators always go after an easily identifiable group first, one which they can easily tar with the brush of responsibility for society's problems. We're seeing it again today, writ smaller, in the constant and repeated assaults on Hollywood...attacking the *picture* of the problem rather than the problem itself. Again, you demonstrate the problem. "Well, it's just these two small groups, really." Then it becomes three groups. Then four. Or you just stay with the two groups...and you harrass, chivvy, destroy, terrorize, humiliate, bankrupt and ultimately lead to the death of many of them. But as long as it's just a couple of small groups, it's not that bad, really. "Every man's death diminishes me. So ask not for whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." I'd also point out that when HUAC started, it was as the result of accusations that there were commies in the Military and the Pentagon; but when they found that they could get on TeeVee and the Newsreels by bringing in actors...that's what they did. What does it do to a nation starstruck by actors to see these same shining examples of the American dream standing before the cameras and naming names of other actors, business associates, others? You speak of the values of a nation...what effect does that have on our values? What *are* our values if we allow this to take place...or dismiss it after the fact as having hurt only a few people, really. It did great harm to the fabric of the nation, not in fines or jail sentences, but in the *heart* of the nation, the way we look to one another. Its effects reverberated long after the HUAC hearings stopped. It bred a level of paranoia that when the youth culture of the 60s began to pop up, many of them were instantly categorized as commies; "Go back to russia where you came from" was a common cry to longhairs in that time. Because to dissent was unpatriotic; the only ones who attacked the government were the commies, end of discussion. The parents of kids who were teenagers in the 60s had come through McCarthy, had learned the wrong lessons of citizenship. No executions? Perhaps Julies and Ethel Rosenberg had some part in spying, maybe they didn't, I don't know if we'll ever know for sure. But the Russians were working on a-bomb technology long before, and records show that they got it pretty much on their own. They were executed as part of the hysteria of the times, their trial a rush to judgment. No, we're not so weak a nation that McCarthy himself can destroy it; WE destroy it, if we allow ourselves to be convinced to turn one another in, to have the heart and soul of the nation sold out to terror and paranoia. Every nation has within its breast the seeds of its own destruction, within its own population; what some individuals do is water that seed, and fertilize it. If it grows, it grows in us. They don't do it to us, we do it to ourselves. And given the right conditions, the right environment, the right soil...we could do it. Even here. jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-Mar-96 16:06:38 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Chris Land <101636.1572@compuserve.com> Subject: OrganicTechnology Chris Land <101636.1572@compuserve.com> asks: > Who has it? > The Minbari? > Am I right? Vorlons and shadows both have organic tech, yes. jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-Mar-96 16:06:39 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bruno Melancon <102647.3222@compuserve.com> Subject: Enjoying Babylon 5 Bruno Melancon <102647.3222@compuserve.com> asks: > 2 questions: 1) What does "3 first acts" mean? > 2) When does your script begins? > It seemed six years after the War, but since the last TV show > doesn't end with an armistice, how did you approach the beginning > of your show? The last V movie ended with the armistice, as I recall; and 3 acts means the 3 dramatic sections between commercials. jms ------------------------------ Date: 07-Mar-96 16:13:55 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: The Ensemble Look {original post unavailable} Then you needn't worry. We have no plans to begin adding any more recurring characters at this point; we have all we need. And, in fact, may start to lose a few of them in the fairly near future. War is hell, you know. jms ------------------------------ Date: 08-Mar-96 23:42:02 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> asks: > Can you tell us what episodes she'll be appearing in for the > remainder of the third season, if any? She's also in "Walkabout" this season. jms ------------------------------ Date: 08-Mar-96 23:42:02 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Violating Your Privacy {original post unavailable} Thanks. If one watches the show "religiously," does that mean one must angle the TV so one faces Mecca, or is simple genuflection sufficient? jms ------------------------------ Date: 08-Mar-96 23:42:05 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: William H. DiPaola <76521.1751@compuserve.com> Subject: The Future of B5 {original post had no questions} Then let me put it as straightforwardly as possible: I *hate* loose ends, and thus the odds of very many things left dangling at the end of the story are fairly small. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 00:20:49 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Fan Club {original post unavailable} We'll give the info out when we've settled for sure on what we're going to be charging, and offering, for the club. (Unlike some clubs, which charge as much as $20 or more, we're trying to keep it down to something a little more reasonable, to keep it more accessible to people.) jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 00:20:49 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: The Ensemble Look (blocked) asks: > So this would be a bad time to set-up as a life insurance > salesman on B5? The key to writing an ensemble show is to use those characters that serve the story, and for no other reason, not becuase you think they should get more on-air time for egos or any other rationale. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 00:20:52 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: The Ensemble Look {original post unavailable} Yes, Walter Koenig, Harlan Ellison and I will *all* be at Chicago ComicCon. This should be most interesting.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 00:20:56 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: John M. Kahane <102664.773@compuserve.com> Subject: The Ensemble Look {original post had no questions} "We care what happens to these people and aliens." Which is essential, whatever happens. If something happens to someone, and you don't care for the character, it's meaningless. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 00:20:56 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> Subject: The Ensemble Look Mike Hoffmann <100321.2604@compuserve.com> asks: > But where does that leave Jerry Doyle? > Can I offer you my life instead? No, Jerry's great to work with, there hasn't been a problem. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 00:21:00 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: The Future of B5 (blocked) asks: > How DO you create a character like Delenn? > How DID you create Delenn? As with any character I create, I tend to peel off a small piece of myself to make the core of it. There are certain aspects of me scattered in all the B5 characters, Delenn in particular. Then you start adding elements that seem to shore up those traits. For Delenn I pulled in some aspects of Zen mysticism, Japanese culture, certain Moslem influences in government and culture (minbar is the name for the pulpit in a mosque)...next comes the layering of history, where she came from, who her parents were, what happened to them (which, btw, you'll hear this season)...where she was when the war started, what she felt about it, what she did at the time, what happened later.... Our personalities are formed in large measure by our history, what we have seen and done and learned. Once you have all those details, you're a long way toward building the character. A character is like a well-reared child, it has aspects of its parents, but is more than just a reflection, and forms its own life after a while. The final element comes in when you have an actor in the role, and you look at the actor and the character and try to merge them, so the truth of the person behind the name becomes the truth of the character. For Mira, that meant hitting those aspects of Minbari culture which I knew would resonate with her background from the former Yugoslavia. I know that if I put her in the middle of a scene in which she has to deal with her government unraveling, what the actor felt when the real thing began to happen will seep out, whether it's wanted or not. Is it manipulative of the actor? Absolutely. Several of the actors have come to me and noted that the character is hitting something that's very close to them, and how did I know to hit them with this? Half of being a writer is observation. It's the same reason I assigned David Gerrold to write "Believers," even though he couldn't at first figure out why he, mainly noted for his light comic work, would be given this heavy dramatic story...until he was well into it, and -- having just adopted a young boy -- had to go through the emotional turmoil I wanted those parents to go through. You have to be part oracle, part counselor, part parent, part boss and partly mad to make this show work.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 00:21:03 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: The Future of B5 Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> asks: > Is it safe to say that one day we *will* see a resoution of the > Londo-G'Kar thread that will dispose of the dream in *some > manner*, even if that is Londo doing something that makes that > unlikely to happen? But of course.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 00:21:07 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: Enjoying Babylon 5 Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> asks: > So this would have been made *instead* of the *amazingly* > pathetic series? This would've followed the last version, and have been truer to the original miniseries. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 00:21:11 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} It can be for a number of reasons. The White Star was moving through a highly charged atmosphere, which would leave detectable trails; it was being fired at by the shadow vessel, which would've attracted considerable attention from the flares; diving at that speed and coming back up there would be considerble heat on the surface of the ship (not normally a problem in space); and it was pretty much shaken up/partially damaged during the fight. Also, at that range, once you're near enough, you can pick it up visually as it gets close; it's not a cloaking system, only a stealth system. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 00:21:14 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} The Agamemnon was not IN the Minbari war; as established in the show, it was one of the first of the Omega class destroyers constructed AFTER the war. It's a *very* impressive battleship, as shown in its battle against the Streib. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 00:21:17 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: OrganicTechnology {original post unavailable} The Lumati don't have organic tech; and a ship using this tech would be a combination of the two, using organic components for certain specific tasks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 00:21:20 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Fred Owens <74051.3602@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 Security Forces Fred Owens <74051.3602@compuserve.com> asks: > For the record, what is the status of the security forces on B5? > Are they EA or are they rent-a-cops hired by Sinclair to manage > his security when he took over due to the problems on the other B > stations? No, they're attached to the Earth Alliance and responsive to those commands. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 00:21:23 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Thought from jms {original post unavailable} Thanks...and yes, a saga is just what I have in mind.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 00:41:21 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: B5:Starlog {original post unavailable} "Everybody involved in B5 is in it for the money." Y'know, this with some of your other comments here -- using the old canard of dismissing anyone who disagrees with you as "worshipping" someone who creates or does a TV show -- amounts to some of the most cynical crap I've seen in a long time. Here's a little revelation for you: Before doing B5, I was a writer producer on MURDER, SHE WROTE. A top-ten (sometimes even top 5) rated megahit for CBS, with extremely high visibility. I resigned M,SW to take on the reins of a syndicated series, which pays me HALF WHAT I EARNED WHEN I WAS ON M,SW. Not only is my producer's fee half what it was when I was at the network, the scripts fees are ALSO far less...about $15,000 as compared to $24,000 for a network script. The residuals are lower in syndication, the publicity budget is less, people pay less attention to you in town. Now...why don't you just sit down and do the math, and poke your head out of your butt long enough to consider that maybe, MAYBE, some people do something because they're motivated by something other than just being in it "for the money." If I were "in it for the money," I would've stayed with a hit network series for major bucks. If I were "in it for the money" I'd be pushing for more merchandising, I'd *NEVER* have set a ceiling of 5 years on the show, and I'd certainly never want to get away from TV and go back to writing novels when this is all over, since books pay a fraction of TV. It's truly sad to see the world through your eyes, in which no one does anything for reasons other than THE BUCKS...no story wanting to be told, no art, no music, no committment, nothing other than sheer, naked greed. Do not mistake cynicism for open-mindedness. Yours is just another form of prejudice. One can be just as close-minded by assuming the worst of others as by (to use your term) "worshipping." jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 17:28:19 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: William H. DiPaola <76521.1751@compuserve.com> Subject: The Future of B5 {original post had no questions} No offense was taken; I was just trying to be clear; it was an important question, and I wanted to get across how strongly I felt on it. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 17:28:19 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: B5 T-shirts {original post unavailable} If they're from All-U or Creation, they're legit; if not, not. jms ------------------------------ Date: 09-Mar-96 17:28:22 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Bruno Melancon <102647.3222@compuserve.com> Subject: Enjoying Babylon 5 {original post had no questions} Problem isn't WB, it's the shrinking syndication marketplace that's making it more difficult for shows not affiliated with one of the webs or weblets to find a home. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-Mar-96 02:13:08 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Violating Your Privacy {original post unavailable} As usual, Buzz Dixon's hold on reality is tenuous at best. He is engaging in the same tactics that tore apart the Guild, in part because he was one of those directly involved in the smear campaigns involving the BBS in question. It's ironic...a BBS is found in which messages from WGA users have been slandered, their sexual, drug, personal and work habits not only openly ridiculed but *catalogued* in library archive files...constituting a de facto blacklist...and this is revealed...and somehow by virtue of showing how a small group of people were maintaining a system dedicated to slander, libel and character assassination itself characterizes an attack on them is mind boggling to say the least. Yes, a user gave me full authorization to access a particular BBS, where I found that members of the WGA Board of Directors, the head of the WGA BBS and others were involved in actions against their fellow members, outright libel, and in violation of Guild rules. I reported this to the Guild, which for political reasons chose to do nothing, leaving me with no choice than to go public with this. Because careers of other writers were being systematically undermined. It was the right thing to do, and I'd do it again. If Buzz is saying that these messages were "selectively edited," then he is lying through his teeth, plain and simple. The entire text, with every single comma in place, was made available to the WGA, and if anything had been taken out of context, all the sysops of this system had to do was to give the WGA access to the message base to prove it. They never did this, and swiftly wiped out the libraries in question, purged the message base, and quickly changed the name of the BBS itself. Becuase they'd been caught doing something utterly reprehensible and indefensible...except by those people directly involved, who're still trying to cover their butts, and smear others in order to protect themselves. As is being done here. Every so often, this thread reappears, the same BS stuff gets posted. Ain't no big deal. I have not "deliberately lied about scores of other writers." This is an outright lie itself. If I had done so, I would have been sued out of business. The majority of the other points raised are the usual distortions, fabrications, petty lies and bigger ones, which are trotted out on a regular basis by a very small group of dysfunctional individuals bent on revenge because I exposed their little smear-club in front of the whole of the WGA. The story was reported upon in the trades, in the local press, even some national press. And, in fact, it led to a "writer" who was in fact NOT a writer, but a convicted felon who'd snuck into the WGA on fake credits, being exposed and removed from the WGA. And yes, absolutely, several Guild members took the WGA BBS to court because it was engaging in illegal business practices. It issued a User's Agreement which was against labor law, in that it restricted message topics and discussions on the WGA BBS, which as a union house cannot legally control or restrict information by union members on its property. This prior restraint was tacitly illegal, and a simple attempt to restrict criticism of Guild officials. So if you've got something illegal...you take it to court. And the court was about to rule that it WAS illegal when the WGA abruptly dropped the UA and shut down the BBS in a move not unlike the current situation in Utah, where to avoid one student group existing, the state shut down ALL student groups. The fee asked for in the suit was to cover the expense of filing a suit against the Guild, which is more than $1, as Dixon well knows. But, again, the facts aren't at issue here. The tactics of the BBS I stumbled upon were to assemble a series of outright lies, innuendo, misinformation, disinformation, and bile into a collected form, which they could use at whim to discredit, harm, or otherwise smear their fellow WGA members. I'm not at all surprised to see that those who were involved in that practice are still continuing it, and that they have dragged this out into the public again. They got caught with their genitalia in the door, and they will never forgive the public humiliation that came when the facts came out. If I had done anything amiss, the Guild or other members had the right to file charges against me. Nothing has ever happened. Because they were in the wrong. The Guild shut down its own BBS rather than allow members speak openly about Guild policies *as required by union law*, engaging in the kind of censorship and prior restraint which any writer must abhor. So now, all we have left is the sour grapes, bile and hatred from those who got exposed. These are sad creatures, really. I feel great pity for them, and do hope they seek counseling for this sometime soon. They know that what they say isn't true; they just hope that by putting it out there, that this will be enough to cause trouble, which is their fondest hope. To smear. What actions I took in this were legally, morally and ethically correct, and it's all very old news. Buzz should get a life. Preferably one that does not involve the continued habit of his peers of smearing other WGA members, as he does here, with half-truths, untruths, distortions and nonsense. This particular act has gotten *real* old. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-Mar-96 02:13:09 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Thought from jms {original post unavailable} Thanks. As for the script book, a new and expanded edition will finally be coming out this Fall, totally rewritten and expanded (by 100,000 words), with new chapters and info. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-Mar-96 15:08:28 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Mark Sloan <100407.3462@compuserve.com> Subject: B5: 5 or 6 years? {original post had no questions} A stand-alone TV movie really can't be an arc in the same sense as a season of the show. So I can't really consider it "a year." A year of story time equals one year of real time. That's the five year arc, which refers to the *series*, to that specific one-to-one ratio. The movie I've always considered to be a preface, or introduction...The Hobbit, if you will, to The Lord of the Rings. If it were going to a sixth year arc, then it should've covered a span of a year; but it only covered a few days. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-Mar-96 15:08:30 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Fan Club (blocked) asks: > Are you going to have some sort of "Charter Membership" for those > of us who are standing in line on day one? One of the things we'll be offering for the first 100 signups, when the details are announced, are full-color decals/stickers of the *alternate* B5 logo designed by Peter Ledger, never actually used in the show. These are from my own personal collection of stuff we did during the development period. We're still looking into what else can be included for those first in line. What we're also going to do is to offer the first two issues of the B5 newsletter free to those who signed onto the original newsletter, which was going to run for only 5 issues, and stopped at #3. This way everyone gets their full money's worth. (The other day I suggested that we start the newsletter with volume 5, on the theory that volumes 1-3 were destroyed or sabotaged at the printer's, and volume 4 vanished mysteriously....) jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-Mar-96 15:08:33 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: B5:Starlog Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> asks: > How many years did you have to worry about where the next meal > was comming from, and how many times did your *mind* tell you > that you were an idiot for trying to be a writer instead of > getting a "straight" job, while your heart wouldn't let you try > something else? Quite true. During the period where I was working to break in as a writer, I earned maybe $3,000 a year tops. I used my little income to buy writing supplies instead of food...at one point, at 6'4" I was down to about 155 pounds. Maybe a bit less. I was getting by on beef jerky and soda because I couldn't afford real food. (Water would've been cheaper than soda, but I needed the sugar rush to get my energy level up enough to write; with the result that by the time I crashed at night I had the shakes from lack of food and the sudden sugar drop.) Everyone told me to forget it, to take a regular job, and let the writing wait. But I knew that if I did this...I'd never get out. It was all or nothing. So yeah, I paid my dues. And then some. And if you pay your dues, and you work hard, and you keep to your vision, and you have something roughly resembling talent...sometimes things work out. They did. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-Mar-96 15:08:36 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: Enjoying Babylon 5 Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> asks: > Incidently, was it in response to this submission that the > infamous "If we give the SF fans rayguns and spaceships the'll > show up" comment was made? No, that comment came when I was still a reporter with the late, lamented LA Herald Examiner, when the V series was still in production, by one of the producers of the series. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-Mar-96 15:08:39 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Darran Williams <101656.2143@compuserve.com> Subject: Babylon 5 - Widescreen {original post had no questions} Haven't heard what the disposition is yet on C4 re: widescreen or regular. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-Mar-96 15:08:42 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: B5 T-shirts {original post unavailable} Then they're *definitely* not legit. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-Mar-96 19:24:19 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: All Subject: From jms re:Email Every once in a while I have to put this out as an FYI, so those of you who know the routine, stand down...the rest of you...c'mere, Unca Straczynski wants a word with you. From time to time, my personal email mailbox begins to fill up with questions that really should be asked in public forums, and which require lengthy, in-depth explanations. (One such today asked me to explain, in detail, the military hierarchy of Earthforce, relative strengths of ships, on and on and on. In itself, not a bad question...but asked in email, that means that I have to answer the same thing for the next guy who asks, on and on and on.) I can't get into detailed, exhaustive discussions of the plot or story or characters *in private email*. If your question is a good or a valid one, it should be posted in a public forum, so that others can benefit from the answer. Otherwise either I end up writing pages of information over and over again, and nobody else gets the information, or I just decline to answer the question. The *only* reason for using email is if it's a personal or a confidential question, or something you don't want to say on the nets for whatever reason. Please help me to keep my head above water by not using email unless there's a valid reason for it. If there *is* something you need to express in email, please use the genie address (straczynski@genie.geis.com) instead of the compuserve address, because the CIS emailbox can only hold 100 letters at a time; any more than that which arrive get bumped and sent back or deleted. I lost an important piece of email regarding B5 business today because it got shoved out by a letter asking me to explain the differences in organization and accountability to oders between the religious and military castes of Minbari. Bear in mind that with CTS, it *hurts* to type. The more I type, the more it hurts. (Please don't send me any more info on CTS, btw...I have all the available information on CTS, more than most doctors right now, and to type a thank you note for each one that comes in just makes the problem worse.) If a question needs answering, better if I can answer it once, so everyone can see it, than 15 times for one person at a time. Every keystroke you see from me comes with discomfort. Please try and use the email address(es) only if there's a valid reason for it; otherwise, let others benefit from the sharpness and quality of your question by asking it publicly. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-Mar-96 22:44:30 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: [F] ALL Subject: NEW B5 EPS! Good news. We've finally convinced Warner Bros./PTEN to go with eight new episodes in a row, starting the first week of April. The new schedule, which just went out via fax to the stations today, is as follows: So here now is the revised schedule: NEW EPISODES: 2/12 EXOGENESIS 2/19 MESSAGES FROM EARTH 2/26 POINT OF NO RETURN (w/Majel Barrett) RERUNS: 3/4 FALL OF NIGHT 3/11 THERE ALL THE HONOR LIES 3/18 AND NOW FOR A WORD 3/25 IN THE SHADOW OF Z'HA'DUM NEW EPISODES: 4/1 SEVERED DREAMS 4/8 CEREMONIES OF LIGHT AND DARK 4/15 SIC TRANSIT VIR 4/22 A LATE DELIVERY FROM AVALON (w/Michael York) 4/29 SHIP OF TEARS (w/Walter Koenig) 5/6 INTERLUDES AND EXAMINATIONS 5/13 WAR WITHOUT END: PART ONE (w/Michael O'Hare) 5/20 WAR WITHOUT END: PART TWO We're now in the process of working to get 2 new episodes in July, so there are only 3 left for October. Even so, we're very excited to get a chance to show eight episodes in a row, building up to the end of the May sweeps with our big two-parter. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-Mar-96 23:28:45 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> Subject: Marcon/Columbus Dispatch Rebecca Eschliman <76072.2345@compuserve.com> asks: > Is this for real, or just Netrumor? Yes, as of this point, I'll be at Marcon with Richard, that's correct. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-Mar-96 23:28:49 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Kevin P. Kenney <104102.352@compuserve.com> Subject: Space Cases Thoughts? Kevin P. Kenney <104102.352@compuserve.com> asks: > Any thoughts on your next step in this in-joke-a-thon? > Will you wait for Peter to do a year 4 script, or might something > crop up this year? I haven't yet decided...though I have some ideas...and a few of them are *real* doozies. jms ------------------------------ Date: 10-Mar-96 23:36:11 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: B5:Starlog {original post unavailable} We've always done everything in our power to assist our actors in taking outside work when they're not needed in the show. We let Stephen Furst out of his contract enough to do "Misery Loves Company" for Fox, and rearranged our shooting schedule days to accommodate him; ditto when Peter Jurasik wanted time off to do "The Late Shift," and Andreas when he wanted to do a recent movie project. The key is that we need *advance word* on these things; then we can adjust the scripts and schedules. If someone comes to us at the last minute, we can't do much about that. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-Mar-96 14:33:00 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Fan Club (blocked) asks: > Are you assembling a mailing list from people who write the PO > box now? There's a mailing list being put together, yes, but what'll count is when the actual checks arrive, and we haven't released the figure yet. BTW, we also plan to offer fan club members a 10% discount on all B5 merchandise produced by the club. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-Mar-96 14:33:02 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: {original post unavailable} Thanks. There's not a lower house in the EA, in the sense that each nation/state has its own various houses, and its own leader, but that leader is also part of the EA senate. One per nation/state. Each nation/state has its own constitution, but must not contravene the larger principles of the EA constitution. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-Mar-96 14:33:03 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Kim Strauss {original post unavailable} Dunno, but I'll find out. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-Mar-96 14:33:05 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: Space Cases Thoughts? {original post had no questions} Oh, I have no intention of writing for the show...but the ball is in my corner now, and I have to return it somehow. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-Mar-96 14:33:07 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Tom Knudsen <72347.1626@compuserve.com> Subject: Space Cases Thoughts? Tom Knudsen <72347.1626@compuserve.com> asks: > Is this a trend you expect to see continue in the future? We're ahead of our time, and forging a new way of doing TV, no question. jms ------------------------------ Date: 11-Mar-96 14:33:09 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Lee McNeil <101611.1440@compuserve.com> Subject: Grey council,more than.. Lee McNeil <101611.1440@compuserve.com> asks: > Anyone else think that this might be refering to the Shadows and > the Vorlons? Any comments ? All I can say is...not bad. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 00:36:18 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Starfury Model? {original post unavailable} Yeah, send me a copy. I think these are the same guys we've already targeted, but it never hurts to be sure. We shut them down as soon as we hear about them. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 00:36:18 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: 8 NEW B5 EPS! (blocked) asks: > Has he been on before? York's a major film actor who's starred in many films, including one of my personal favorites, "Cabaret." Also in the "Logan's Run" movie. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 00:36:25 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Two questions... {original post unavailable} The Playgirl with Biggs is out now here in the states; I don't know the issue date offhand, but it came out a couple/three weeks ago. It's only a one-page or so item. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 00:36:26 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Sarah E. Heacock <102412.1400@compuserve.com> Subject: From jms re:Email {original post had no questions} That's true, but only until the moderated groups is up and running, which I hope is soon, then all internet folks will continue to have free access. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 00:36:32 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: FoN {original post had no questions} Thanks. Yes, the show (and individual episodes) takes on a different sense the more you watch it, and can look back. It's fun.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 14:47:29 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Babylon 5 - Widescreen {original post unavailable} No, the report is not correct. Only the 2-hour pilot was filmed in normal aspect ratio; from day one, the series has been shot in widescreen format, cropped for current ratios. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 14:47:30 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Mark Sloan <100407.3462@compuserve.com> Subject: Duck food? Mark Sloan <100407.3462@compuserve.com> asks: > Did someone once say negotiating with TV executives was "like > being nibbled to death by ducks"? If so, who was it? > Have I got the context right? I think it was Eric Severied of CBS News. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 23:50:26 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Two questions... {original post unavailable} No, no plans for feeders. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 23:50:27 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Fan Club {original post unavailable} There's a PO box, which I'll post when we're closer to doing this. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 23:50:30 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: 8 NEW B5 EPS! (blocked) asks: > (Guess I'm dating mysel!) On another note, have you ever > kill off a main character in B5? If not, is that ever a > possibilty? Yes, we killed Lt. Keffer, one of our starfury pilot recurring characters, and killed Talia's primary personality. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 23:50:38 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Cherns Major <75026.3723@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 PR Cherns Major <75026.3723@compuserve.com> asks: > Can you say, "Blessed are the cheesemakers"? No, actually, it's neither annoying nor irritating to have all my posts archived. For starters, it keeps me honest; I don't think I've ever been caught out in a major contradiction. It shows the progression of events, and chronicles how a show is made for educational purposes. (Since some are opting out of being reposted, I'm going to try to make my replies here more reflective, so they can be followed even without any supporting messages.) jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 23:50:39 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: 8 NEW B5 EPS! {original post unavailable} We knew last year that Kung Fu would only go 4 seasons, as that was what PTEN needed to make the production worthwhile. 88 episodes is a good average syndication package. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 23:50:41 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Fred Owens <74051.3602@compuserve.com> Subject: Security Forces again Fred Owens <74051.3602@compuserve.com> asks: > Are the B5 security forces a civilian organization or a military > unit? It's regulated as part of the military. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 23:50:45 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: 8 NEW B5 EPS! {original post unavailable} Thanks, we try to keep it interesting. jms ------------------------------ Date: 12-Mar-96 23:50:46 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Andrew Diseker <70714.105@compuserve.com> Subject: Question re:First Ones Andrew Diseker <70714.105@compuserve.com> asks: > Now, the question is: Just because the "First Ones," Vorlons, and > Shadows are old races, does age necessarily lead to maturity, or > does a race only last to become an old one by becoming mature? A first one is a first one because...well, they're first. But yes, the characters are growing. Growth and change are at the center of the show. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-Mar-96 12:28:06 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Other Arc Series {original post unavailable} I think they have the potential to become very popular, if done right; if they're treated as novels, which means you're going to be tied to the quality of the person telling the story. If it's just done as a gimmick, then arc-series won't hit it. My sense is that since over the next few years series may end up having shorter runs due to the massive amount of available programming, why not build it to turn that to an advantage? jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-Mar-96 12:28:08 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: The "whys" {original post unavailable} Well, you've just asked two questions disgused as one; why do *I* feel I need to tell this story, and why should this story *need* to be told. I need to tell this story because it won't let go. The only way to get rid of it is to tell it. Because I think it may be important. It needs to be told because I think it has some ideas we need to hear, and because it's time somebody did a saga like this to help reinterpret some myths at a time when we very badly need our myths. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-Mar-96 12:28:09 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: 8 NEW B5 EPS! {original post unavailable} It's too early to tell if the Kung Fu situation will have any impact on B5. jms ------------------------------ Date: 13-Mar-96 22:57:24 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Rumor: B-5 canceled? {original post unavailable} Yes, as I recall, last May we were told that year four would almost certainly be the last for Kung Fu. Which is no secret; all parties pretty much knew that going into the renewal period. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-Mar-96 00:09:30 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Arwel Parry <100336.623@compuserve.com> Subject: Jumpgate dimensions {original post had no questions} They're pretty big...but because they're not anchored, they can (and do) move apart to accommodate larger ships when necessary. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-Mar-96 00:09:32 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Other Arc Series {original post unavailable} If B5 goes its full five years, I think I'd probably prefer to get out of TV and go back to writing novels and plays. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-Mar-96 00:09:33 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: The "whys" {original post had no questions} Of course, there are many who don't see such people in a Good Light; even Washington had people out smearing his name every day (which, among more altruistic reasons, was why he didn't want to stay in charge forever). We are never so greatly appreciated as when we're safely and conveniently deceased. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-Mar-96 00:09:40 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: AT on JAG? {original post unavailable} I have no idea what Andrea's going to be doing, or how much. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-Mar-96 00:09:41 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Blaine Jack <103333.304@compuserve.com> Subject: Thought from jms {original post had no questions} Thanks.... jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-Mar-96 12:05:16 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: Jumpgate dimensions Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> asks: > I mean, everyone knows how to build 'em, and pretty well how they > work, but *everybody* bough plans for the things and they haven't > changed in the whole history of the galaxy? Yeah, generally, the tech is pretty standard, and universal, so you don't get a lot of variation with jump gates. jms ------------------------------ Date: 14-Mar-96 12:12:03 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Laurence Moroney <100546.50@compuserve.com> Subject: YEAR (sing) of shd war.. Laurence Moroney <100546.50@compuserve.com> asks: > Does that mean it ends this season? > What happens then to years 4 and 5? I think it's fair to say that the shadow war will drag on into at least a portion of the fourth season. Bear in mind that in the first season, we didn't even know the shadows *existed* until it was almost over. This is more than just the story of this particular war. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-Mar-96 00:15:24 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: TJG Hamshere <101351.3145@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 RPG? {original post had no questions} Nope, the time I spend here is on my own dime in terms of time invested. Wouldn't have it any other way. And yes, there will be a B5 rpg coming out later this year, and yes, as with all licensed B5 products, I'll be involved in the development process. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-Mar-96 00:15:26 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Theo Thourson <73214.2131@compuserve.com> Subject: Other Arc Series Theo Thourson <73214.2131@compuserve.com> asks: > Full length or one act? I tend to write both full-length and one-act plays, depending on the requirements of the topic. I've had about a dozen produced (a mix of both lengths), and one published (and no, I won't tell you where, because I was only 18-19 when I wrote it, and that it's still in print leave me chagrined no end). I actually tend to write just about anything; I enjoy working in, and have sold in, every form of prose: short stories, novels, anthologies, articles, investigative pieces, nonfiction books, even songs. The one thing at which I'm *truly* awful however is poetry. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-Mar-96 00:15:28 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Just a Question {original post unavailable} Too simple. Not it. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-Mar-96 00:15:31 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: YEAR (sing) of shd war.. {original post unavailable} The information about the Battle of the Line comes back into play twice this season, and the Minbari soul aspect is a major aspect we'll be getting into at one point this season as well. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-Mar-96 00:15:32 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Laurence Moroney <100546.50@compuserve.com> Subject: YEAR (sing) of shd war.. Laurence Moroney <100546.50@compuserve.com> asks: > Does that mean we will lose the Vorlons when the war is over? > Or, as a previous hypothesis of mine went, does that mean we will > _become_ the Vorlons when the war is over? By the way, Kosh is > Clarence isn't he? You make those assumptions about the war dominating the show because that's the obvious way to go, and the way most shows *would* go. We're many things, but obvious ain't one of them. There's more to it. But no, we don't become Vorlons at the end of the war. They're who and what they are because they're millions of years older than we are; you don't just get that status in a box of Crackerjacks. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-Mar-96 00:25:47 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: When is..... {original post unavailable} Story ideas aren't safe just because this season is over (from a writing POV), because you can just as easily toss something out that's planned for year 4. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-Mar-96 13:53:24 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> Subject: B5 RPG? Philip Hornsey <74053.2101@compuserve.com> asks: > Who is doing it? Chameleon Games is doing the RPG. jms ------------------------------ Date: 15-Mar-96 13:53:25 From: J. Michael Straczynski <71016.1644@compuserve.com> To: (blocked) Subject: Babylon 5 - Widescreen (blocked) asks: > Are you able to say if we are ever likely to get B5 commercially > available in widescreen ? Eventually, yes, B5 will be available in w